• @200ok
    link
    English
    2142 months ago

    Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

    I’m honestly curious how this would “harm Americans”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1042 months ago

      Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

    • @ladicius
      link
      English
      892 months ago

      That statement is technically true.

      The billionaire owners are Americans.

      • @Beldarofremulak
        link
        English
        41
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about “Americans” they aren’t talking about us schlubs.

      • @Homescool
        link
        English
        122 months ago

        The corporations are people too!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        I refuse to call any Billionaires Americans. A billionaire in America has far more in common with a billionaire in Ireland or France than with working class Americans. They don’t use our schools, drink our water, drive our roads, or rely on our safety nets. They don’t take out the trash, do their laundry, wait 6 months for a doctor’s appointment, or stress over defunding their retirement to pay for needed medication.

        Billionaire involvement in politics should be considered foreign interference. Of course AIPAC is foreign interference too, but apparently that’s not a problem either.

    • @phoneymouse
      link
      English
      242 months ago

      Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

      • @brucethemoose
        link
        English
        192 months ago

        I fear this is exactly who they’re courting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
      This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that’s left.

      • ferret
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        It would leave the newly-split-off chrome in the same financial situation as firefox. Arguably a worse one.

      • @penfore
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        That’s really sad…

    • Jo Miran
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      …a radical interventionist agenda…

      That language seems very “Trump-esque”, and I doubt it is a coincidence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it’s own is not a business.

      Say you buy chrome, you have to options

      1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you’re in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

      2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

      Neither of these options are better than the status quo