• @Doomsider
    link
    English
    -384 days ago

    So miniscule it won’t poison you but just enough to prevent tooth decay. You really can’t have it both ways. Pretending there is any real control over measurement is also ridiculous. Not to mention there is no need to drink fluoride.

    You know what does work? Using fluoride topically and getting good dental care.

      • @Doomsider
        link
        English
        -244 days ago

        I don’t know. I do know fluoride works topically. I also know there is no mechanism in the body to return fluoride to the teeth topically after it is swallowed.

        So drinking fluoride is pointless.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          244 days ago

          I don’t know.

          You don’t need to know. Statistically dental health increases when municipal water is fluoridated.

          • @Doomsider
            link
            English
            -144 days ago

            Having read many studies on this the consensus is it probably does not help much if the population has adequate dental care.

            https://www.cochrane.org/news/water-fluoridation-less-effective-now-past

            We know what works, dental care and brushing have a huge benefit that is proven.

            The idea of giving everyone fluoride in the water supply is pretty retarded really for several reasons.

            If it naturally occurs fine, but adding it is ridiculous.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              154 days ago

              Ok, so for the poor people without care in those populations we say fuck them?

              The mentally ill that don’t do self care?

              Fluoridation is providing a baseline. “Does not help much” is a useless statement if that includes everyone with the means for higher levels of care.

              There are a bunch of policy decisions that are like this. Yes, it won’t help you. Get over it, you aren’t the whole city.

        • @ysjet
          link
          English
          104 days ago

          So you don’t know, but all the data scientists and dentists, who DO know and are subject matter experts, who say it’s a good idea are to be ignored, because of your sheer ignorance?

          • @Doomsider
            link
            English
            -134 days ago

            Nobody refutes anything I am saying. I think you are confused.

            • @ysjet
              link
              English
              94 days ago

              We’ve refuted it, scientific testing has refuted it, you’re just plugging your ears and refusing to listen because you don’t like the answers.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                54 days ago

                And because random social media people spout conspiracies about it and clearly they’re more educated on the topic than actual trained professionals.

                /S

              • @Doomsider
                link
                English
                -114 days ago

                I said fluoride works topically. Do you deny this? Please provide evidence to the contrary.

                I said there is no way for the body to return fluoride where it is needed. Swallowing fluoride is pointless and unnecessary at best. At worst it is probably not a good idea to have fluoride in your water if you have kidney disease.

                Don’t bother actually, we already no you know literally nothing about this topic.

                • @brucethemoose
                  link
                  English
                  64 days ago

                  You are spouting assertions about what sounds right while ignoring bodies of scientific evidence contradicting your viewpoint. Just because Lemmy users are unwilling to spend 20-30 minutes digging through arixv to refute you doesn’t make you right.

                  You don’t want to go and look up and analyze evidence that floride in the water supply is beneficial, you want to just assert the hypothesis you’ve formed as likely truth without evidence and research into related work, and I can confidently say this because experts who spend their lives reading papers and writing them on this very topic are qualified to make these assertions.

                  …This “sounds right” line of thinking has been the bane of civilization for eons. You aren’t breaking up some scientific fallacy like the church believing the Earth is the center of the universe, you are perpetuating one.

                  • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                    link
                    English
                    -24 days ago

                    while ignoring bodies of scientific evidence contradicting your viewpoint

                    They have viewpoints on topical application of fluoride and lack of effect on teeth after swallowing.

                    What bodies of evidence are contradicting these opinions?

                  • @Doomsider
                    link
                    English
                    -64 days ago

                    https://www.cochrane.org/news/water-fluoridation-less-effective-now-past

                    The latest studies indicate fluoride in the drinking supply has little effect compared compared to fluoride toothpaste. So you once it is available the need for adding fluoride to water goes away. This has been supported by numerous studies comparing countries that do not add fluoride to their water.

                    I studied this in a 400 level water course at UNI. I got to visit wastewater and water plants and speak with operators. I was surprised to learn the fluoride was not naturally occuring in the water supply as it is advertised on the EPA website.

                    Then I found an article about a small town in Canada that ran out of fluoride because of a downturn in fertilizer manufacturing. I thought to myself what does fertilizer manufacturing have to do with fluoride.

                    That is when I discovered the truth that a toxic by-product of fertilizer manufacturing is sold to municipalities to be disposed of in our water supply. It is not pharmeucutical fluoride because that would cost too much. Oh and it is contaminated with nasty stuff like heavy metals.

                    I then did a bunch of research comparing rates of tooth decay in different areas of the world. It really did not appear to make a difference but actual dental care and fluoride toothpaste did.

                    My presentation was about a hour and a half where I presented all my research. I got an A on it and everyone was very impressed with what I discovered.

                    But sure tell me about my own journey when you literally have no fucking clue what you are talking about about.

          • @Doomsider
            link
            English
            -154 days ago

            If it is so good to swallow them why not swallow after brushing. Why are you so obsessed with swallowing something that does not help.

            • @Licksrocks
              link
              English
              84 days ago

              Plenty of things we ingest are toxic in high doses, but valuable in smaller amounts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 days ago

              Different concentrations. If water is so good for you, why don’t you drink 10 gallons a day?

              • @Doomsider
                link
                English
                -94 days ago

                So then you admit there is no point in drinking fluoride then? Miniscule amount does not make a difference and the normal topical amount you use while brushing is not safe to swallow.

                This isn’t rocket science.