• Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3810 hours ago

    [Bluesky] is in breach of EU regulations for not disclosing key details about the group […] “All platforms in the EU . . . have to have a dedicated page on their website where it says how many users they have in the EU and where they are legally established,”

    The commission cannot regulate Bluesky directly as it does not yet reach the threshold of more than 45mn monthly users in the EU to be designated a very large online platform.

    So, basically: it isn’t there yet because it isn’t necessary yet.

    …as suspicious as I am of Bluesky, the title of the article is kind of misleading.

    • @General_Effort
      link
      English
      66 hours ago

      That’s not correct. The FT has not explained this clearly.

      If an online platform has more than 45 million monthly users (~10% of EU population) then it is classified as a Very Large Online Platform. In that case, the Commission can directly make rules for it.

      If it has fewer users, then it is still regulated by the Digital Services Act (DSA). The DSA claims jurisdiction over all platforms that have users in the EU. Among other things, they need to have a representative in the EU (IIUC). FWIW I’m pretty sure that lemmy is not compliant either.

      DSA: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2065&qid=1732567528372

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 hours ago

        I think you need to not be a small enterprise to fall under those rules.

        You’d need more than 50 employees or EUR 10m in turnover. Each Lemmy server would likely count individually.

        • @General_Effort
          link
          English
          13 hours ago

          Micro and small enterprises are excepted from some rules but far from all.

          I think that lemmy servers would count individually, as well, but it is not guaranteed. In any case, that comes with its own problems.

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        Thanks for the additional info. The article is a mess.

    • @ericbomb
      link
      English
      138 hours ago

      Also in the article: " Regnier said the commission, the EU’s executive arm, had written to the 27 national governments to see “if they can find any trace of Bluesky” such as identifying a EU-based office. It has not yet contacted the company directly, he added. "

      Like this is so nonsensical. Talking to press about a company having broken a rule even though they are not under your jurisdiction, but you haven’t bothered to contact yet, is just wild.

      If they reached out and said “Hey, before you reach these metrics you need to fulfill these requirements” and bluesky told them to pound sand, that’d be good to know.

      But “Company who doesn’t have to follow a rule is not following the rule, and we’d like them to, but haven’t told them we’d like them to” is not news.

    • JoYo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I feel like this is easily solved by decentralization. if only bluesy was decentralized.

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 hours ago

        Bluesky is too busy RP-ing as federated to be actually federated.

        • Digitalprimate
          link
          English
          47 hours ago

          Hey, if they get traction, it’s a start.