BTW the tank has a better forward view than the truck

  • @PunnyName
    link
    English
    1612 months ago

    Just gonna keep on posting this

    • @FireRetardant
      link
      English
      842 months ago

      There really should be legal requirements for sightlines like this for most vehicles on the road.

      • @chonglibloodsport
        link
        English
        382 months ago

        That’s a good temporary fix but the long term solution is to get rid of stroads and get back to proper separation between streets (which are narrow, one way, and walkable) and roads (which have a high speed limit, very few intersections, and no driveways). This would dramatically cut down on the number of encounters between pedestrians and cars, while also making suburbs much more walkable and livable.

        Streetcar suburbs, the most desirable neighbourhoods to live in, are illegal to build in most cities!

        • @FireRetardant
          link
          English
          42
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          We could do both. I don’t see how increasing visibility is a “temporary fix”, I see that as a safety improvement regardless of how well designed a street is. Even the safest designed street is even safer by increasing the visibility a driver has. It also just makes driving easier in general.

          Edit: it is also an unfortunate reality that people run over their own children or pets in their own driveway and better sightlines can reduce this risk.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 months ago

        Because when laws and policies are first made with the assumption people aren’t assholes. We literally believed people will do the right thing.

        All the addendums were to fix asshole behaviors.

        • Liz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Yeah you really gotta design your laws with the assumption that someone will try to abuse it in one way or another. You need to red-team your bills.

    • @ComicalMayhem
      link
      English
      132 months ago

      it bothers me a little that it’s not in order

      • @PunnyName
        link
        English
        26
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s in an order: height of the front of the vehicle from the ground.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s grill height until the first kid shows up, then it’s the distance away from the vehicle at which the kid becomes visible.

          • @PunnyName
            link
            English
            62 months ago

            Ahh, nice clarification!

        • @FireRetardant
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          It’s only in that order for the first half of the chart then it gets a little jumbled

          • Laurel Raven
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Not jumbled, it’s the distance to seeing the kid after that

          • @PunnyName
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Kinda, yeah. Looks like it’s mostly typical household cars, and then 3 examples of taller vehicles with actually better angles of vision.

        • @ComicalMayhem
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          oh hey it is. dunno how I didn’t notice that

    • @ohwhatfollyisman
      link
      English
      72 months ago

      i know this is anecdotal but i’ve sat up front in the bajaj re tuktuk. one can almost see the single front wheel from that position – visibility for that one vehicle is definitely closer than the 2 meters shown in this graphic.