Edit: to clarify: the message in the ad is actually ironic/satirical, mocking the advice for cyclists to wear high-viz at night.

It uses the same logic but inverts the parts and responsabilities, by suggesting to motorists (not cyclists) to apply bright paint on their cars.

So this ad is not pro or against high-viz, it’s against victim blaming

Cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113544508246569296

  • @Tudsamfa
    link
    English
    -13 days ago

    Your standard bicycle has light too? If it’s about being the safest cyclist possible, you’d also need a loud siren declaring that a bicycle is on the road. At some point it is ridiculous how many non-mandatory rules you need to follow until drivers accept that they are to blame for the crash, how about we stick to the actual laws and people who can’t see a vehicle fitted with reflectors and lights get off the road.

    Hint: seeing the lights on a bicycle is easier when your wind shield isn’t 2 meters of the ground.

    • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Your standard bicycle has light too

      No it doesn’t. It has reflectors but not actual lighting. I’ve almost hit a few cyclists who relied only on the reflectors on the wheels, front peg, and rear peg.

      Hint: seeing the lights on a bicycle is easier when your wind shield isn’t 2 meters of the ground.

      I’m not arguing pro cars here. My point is keep yourself fuckin safe. Don’t be stupid just because “bUt CaRs ArE tHe PrObLeM”

      You can’t say they’re a problem and then act like they’re not a problem.

      Complain all you want it’s perfectly valid. But do the shit you have to do to keep yourself the fuck alive.

      • @Tudsamfa
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Goddamn, forgot that the USA considers bikes as exercise machines.

        Your standard commuter bike has lights, and is required by law to have it in most countries.