• JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 hours ago

    You can’t seriously be suggesting Arch for new Linux users.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I wasn’t really. Read the rest of the comments.

      But on another note i went straight from windows to Arch as a complete linux noob and never looked back.

      • @Fecundpossum
        link
        English
        310 hours ago

        I did the same with Endeavour and ended up on fedora. I can monitor and merge pacnew files…… but why the hell should I when fedora runs like a champ with software almost as fresh off the presses as arch and basically zero maintenance.

        An arch based system was an excellent learning tool but it isn’t viable for the majority of users.

        This concludes my sectarian rant. Btw.

          • @Fecundpossum
            link
            English
            12 hours ago

            lol no.

            Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 hours ago

          Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I’m pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn’t get in my way.

          • @Fecundpossum
            link
            English
            16 hours ago

            I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot.