• JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1313 hours ago

      You can’t seriously be suggesting Arch for new Linux users.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I wasn’t really. Read the rest of the comments.

        But on another note i went straight from windows to Arch as a complete linux noob and never looked back.

        • @Fecundpossum
          link
          English
          312 hours ago

          I did the same with Endeavour and ended up on fedora. I can monitor and merge pacnew files…… but why the hell should I when fedora runs like a champ with software almost as fresh off the presses as arch and basically zero maintenance.

          An arch based system was an excellent learning tool but it isn’t viable for the majority of users.

          This concludes my sectarian rant. Btw.

            • @Fecundpossum
              link
              English
              14 hours ago

              lol no.

              Canonical has left a bad taste in my mouth far too many times. Snaps are generally awful, collecting analytics without user knowledge at one point. If I was going to use something Ubuntu based it would be mint, but I prefer a native vanilla gnome experience.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 hours ago

            Do you use Fedora Workstation or Silverblue? Is the KDE version fine to use? I’m pretty tempted to switch, I just want a reasonably up to date system that doesn’t get in my way.

            • @Fecundpossum
              link
              English
              19 hours ago

              I run workstation with Gnome. KDE is fine, and fedora implements it in vanilla fashion without any tweaks, which is good. I personally stopped using KDE because it doesn’t always work the way I want it to, and Gnome does. Games can easily be swapped between monitors if it opens on the wrong one initially. Gnome took some getting used to but it’s fantastic. Give it a shot.

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        English
        1515 hours ago

        Anyone who is just starting out with Linux and doesn’t want to put in a lot of effort should definitely choose Mint over Arch. If you really want to learn the ins and outs, Arch is great. If you just want a usable computer, Mint is your daddy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1312 hours ago

          Anyone who suggests Arch as the starter Linux distro is absolutely delusional and has probably never spoken to or interacted with the average person.

          • Diplomjodler
            link
            English
            1212 hours ago

            They’re the kind of people who write “Git gud, n00b!” in Linux forums.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          914 hours ago

          I also won’t recommend someone to use Arch as their first Distros. You will not have a great time. You need to learn how to use the terminal first.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        513 hours ago

        Even Ubuntu is fine as a gateway drug. Or Pop Os! Don’t be afraid to recommend easy solutions to Linux beginners who otherwise might not be interested in learning the internals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 hours ago

        Thats fair, i also did it for the memes.

        On Lemmy it does feel like preaching to the choir but thats no excuse to not have included both.