Lets take a little break from politics and have us a real atheist conversation.

Personally, I’m open to the idea of the existence of supernatural phenomena, and I believe mainstream religions are actually complicated incomplete stories full of misinterpretations, misunderstandings, and half-truths.

Basically, I think that these stories are not as simple and straightforward as they seem to be to religious people. I feel like there is a lot more to them. Concluding that all these stories are just made up or came out of nowhere is kind of hard for me.

  • @aLaStOr_MoOdY47OP
    link
    English
    -71 month ago

    Saying that I’m making a god of the gaps argument would also mean that you are making a science of the gaps argument.

    • EleventhHour
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Except, when you fill the gaps with science, you have evidence and proof. Not superstition and ancient myth.

      • @aLaStOr_MoOdY47OP
        link
        English
        01 month ago

        But you’re still leading yourself into a fallacious argument. It’s not any better.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          It’s only a fallacious argument if you don’t say “we can’t answer that yet” and maybe add, “but here are some theories…”

          “I don’t know” does not mean “therefore the supernatural is real.”

          • @aLaStOr_MoOdY47OP
            link
            English
            01 month ago

            My goal really is to convince people to sit on the fence about it.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              English
              31 month ago

              Convince people that the supernatural is real? Because that is exactly what you’re not doing with this line of argument.