• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The Islamist militant group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)

    Uh no thanks. It’s hard to be sympathetic towards any official side of that war because they’re all major assholes. Why do they only have socialists and islamists in those areas? Why hasn’t liberalism and freedom taken root in the Near East?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Can’t imagine why the Middle East doesn’t trust liberals, it’s a real goddamn mystery.

      Injects oil directly into his veins

    • @trashgirlfriend
      link
      English
      -16 hours ago

      Liberalism and its “freedom” hasn’t taken root because:

      1. Liberals fucked the whole region in the first place.

      2. Shareholder profits are not going to inspire the masses to take up arms and fight.

      Liberalism cannot provide a better future for anyone, so the people turn towards the groups who try to provide a change.

      Extremely funny you say this in this situation since there is a group here fighting for freedom and democracy but they’re stinky reds, so you’ll hate them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Extremely funny you say this in this situation since there is a group here fighting for freedom and democracy but they’re stinky reds, so you’ll hate them.

        The other things you said can be accepted as opinions, but here I’ll have to correct you: In this conflict, Bashar al-Assad is the socialist (Ba’athist), and the group “fighting for freedom and democracy”, as you put it, is Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham. They are a far-right islamist religious fundamentalist terrorist organization.

        So essentially nobody in Syria is fighting for democracy nor freedom.

        • @trashgirlfriend
          link
          English
          35 hours ago

          I was talking about AANES, not the “socialist” Assad or the clearly religious authoritarian groups in the area.

      • @Randelung
        link
        English
        15 hours ago

        I liked the image I saw a few days back. Conservatives will play to your base needs (food/water, shelter, family), while Liberals/Socialists expect selflessness and assume all your needs are already met, including self-fulfilment.

        Especially in the poorer and war torn regions of the world, the former is magnitudes more appealing. If non-extremist groups want to have a chance, they need to cover the bases first.