Maybe you haven’t been convinced by a good enough argument. Maybe you just don’t want to admit you are wrong. Or maybe the chaos is the objective, but what are you knowingly on the wrong side of?

In my case: I don’t think any games are obliged to offer an easy mode. If developers want to tailor a specific experience, they don’t have to dilute it with easier or harder modes that aren’t actually interesting and/or anything more than poorly done numbers adjustments. BUT I also know that for the people that need and want them, it helps a LOT. But I can’t really accept making the game worse so that some people get to play it. They wouldn’t actually be playing the same game after all…

  • @Lauchs
    1•5 hours ago

    I mean, Byron had to flee England for fear of lynching and Oscar Wilde spent two years in prison for homosexuality.

    And the abolitionists weren’t wildly popular but they were popular enough to win a broad base of support in the North.

    And I’m sure folks a couple hundred years ago could multi task.

    How is it a false equivalence though? The basic notion is that there are things you can be morally right on that may cause more actual harm.

    Meanwhile, I only ever started this to answer someone’s question. As I’ve said repeatedly, I don’t think it’s an effective tactic as you’d split the progressive vote.

    That being said, culture war shit and immigration is what the Right is running and winning on.

    If you want to reign in the rich and corporations on climate change, it ain’t going to come from the Right. So, we need to win elections.

    • @agent_nycto
      1•1 hour ago

      It’s false equivalence because, again, these are two separate scenarios.

      The first is your hypothetical assumption based off of a completely different culture and time period, and the second is, you know, the here and now in the present day. Factual reality.

      Arrogantly going “well I think this would’ve gone badly if they did something completely different totally equates to what’s happening now” is a pretty ballsy form of false equivalence. You can’t even come up with a real scenario to compare the present situation with.