@[email protected] to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 18 hours agoCorkscrewlemmy.zipimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1458arrow-down14
arrow-up1454arrow-down1imageCorkscrewlemmy.zip@[email protected] to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 18 hours agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-square@PunnyNamelink53•17 hours agoI think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
minus-square@De_Narmlink19•17 hours agoOkay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 hours agoThe ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•17 hours agoi think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•17 hours agoTwo many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels
I think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
Okay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
The ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.
i think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
Two many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels