@[email protected] to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 1 month agoCorkscrewlemmy.zipimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1520arrow-down14
arrow-up1516arrow-down1imageCorkscrewlemmy.zip@[email protected] to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-square@PunnyNamelink57•1 month agoI think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
minus-square@De_Narmlink21•1 month agoOkay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•1 month agoi think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•1 month agoTwo many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoThe ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.
I think you’re right. “Two” being correct in a short form of saying “two too many”.
Okay, I misread that. But two too many implies a third level, otherwise there would be no joke left.
i think that perhaps they would have preferred to understand none of the joke, to persist in blissful ignorance.
Two many is grammatically incorrect, but implies a total of two levels
The ww2 propaganda would be a strech for a third one but still could work.