GHiLA to [email protected] • 1 month agoI did that!sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1538arrow-down1145 cross-posted to: politicalmemes
arrow-up1393arrow-down1imageI did that!sh.itjust.worksGHiLA to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square124fedilink cross-posted to: politicalmemes
minus-square@FooBarringtonlink14•1 month agoNo, he couldn’t. Remember that the SC did not list the “official acts” that would be covered under immunity, so the SC is the arbiter in any specific case. A republican president however could, that’s out of the question.
No, he couldn’t. Remember that the SC did not list the “official acts” that would be covered under immunity, so the SC is the arbiter in any specific case.
A republican president however could, that’s out of the question.
He could still do it just for funsies.
Just one, as a treat.