• @frunch
    link
    English
    1061 month ago

    Can we though? Are you thinking of the shareholders at all?!? Someone’s going to have a tough time having only 4 holiday homes to choose from… 😬

    • chingadera
      link
      English
      53
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      JUST 4? ARE YOU INSANE?

      First of all two of those are under a cold front right now, and one of them is having maintenance done in the West courtyard (noisy from 3pm-3:30pm if you are within 6 bedrooms of it, which I assure you, we won’t be) and the fourth one we were just at 2 years ago so it’s a little much to vacation there again that soon.

      Please think before you speak.

      • @frunch
        link
        English
        191 month ago

        My apologies and condolences for any tribulations my thoughtfulness may have bestowed upon you. In my haste to protect my interests and that of my colleagues, i spoke before fully considering the gravity of my statements 🫠

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Generally the only thing I think about shareholders is feeding them into a grinder feet first.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 days ago

        As a shareholder I can tell you the ones you could have reason for sending to the guillotine are mostly companies

        Only the very worst of the super wealthy investors and the companies are pressing for maximum income now which is what wrecks and/or enshittifies businesses

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -71 month ago

      It’s the NYC Subway. It’s not a company, it’s government mass transit. They had big problems with homeless people harassing people and the cops weren’t doing much. Ridership was dropping. So they did the only thing they could do.

      It sucks, but what do you expect from the subway? A solution to homeless people? It’s for getting people to where they want to go, not for being a shelter.

      • @PunnyName
        link
        English
        161 month ago

        Keep the benches, and pressure the system to help house and treat the underlying issues of homelessness.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          New York City already provides shelter space for anyone who asks. It’s the city’s obligation according to the state constitution. (This is one reason why so many migrants came to NYC.) The homeless people in the subway system generally don’t want to go to a shelter.

          As for treating the underlying issues: many of these people are either schizophrenics or drug addicts. There’s no straightforward treatment for either condition.

          • @PunnyName
            link
            English
            61 month ago

            Guess that solves it, then. Good chat.

              • @PunnyName
                link
                English
                61 month ago

                It doesn’t make profits, that’s why people haven’t done it. They’ll bend over backwards to help if it’s insanely profitable. Short term profits, to be exact

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        029 days ago

        There are solutions, for example arms between seating positions to make laying down impossible; sharp fins between seating positions to make laying down uncomfortable

        These are common worldwide

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 month ago

        Taking Benches away is LITERALLY the ONLY Option! How can you Expect Police Officers to do anything when there’s FARE JUMPERS that need to be SHOT!