• ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    English
    791 day ago

    and pardon on a case-by-case basis the working-class Americans in the federal prison system whose lives have been ruined by unjustly aggressive prosecutions for nonviolent offenses

    It’s a noble idea in principle. But how the hell can a sizeable number of innocent or excessively punished people be pardoned on a case by case basis in the span of under 7 weeks?

    This is an extremely impractical idea to implement, and reeks of empty grandstanding in by Jeffries.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      814 hours ago

      “Sorry for the shitty system we’re kind of responsible for. Go see Moana 2!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1522 hours ago

      Just pardon them all to bankrupt the prison system and realize that while you let a few awful people go free most of the people you pardoned and those around them will have markedly better lives.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      301 day ago

      It’s also entirely too broad to mean much of anything.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 day ago

        The letter noted that the US has disproportionately incarcerated people of color, low-income individuals, members of the LGBTQ+ community and those with disabilities, and that 90% of the federal prison population was convicted on non-violent offenses.

        What are you talking about? If the rich and the powerful get justice why not the rest of us too? Since when has justice been too broad?

        • @AbidanYre
          link
          English
          1423 hours ago

          That’s kind of exactly my point. 90% is still a lot of people and I doubt the database of federal inmates has an “unjustly prosecuted” filter. But there are some non-violent white collar criminals who absolutely belong in prison (including about half of Trump’s advisors) so there needs to be something to focus on like marijuana possession or whistleblowers or something else that can narrow the scope.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            922 hours ago

            Here you go.

            Despite these actions, the Last Prisoner Project (LPP) notes in a statement that Biden “has yet to release a single person still incarcerated for cannabis through commutation.” Although the pardons granted relief to thousands of people with a conviction on their records, the president’s clemency actions did not address the approximately 3,000 individuals serving time in federal prisons for cannabis related offenses.

            https://www.forbes.com/sites/ajherrington/2024/11/26/nonprofit-group-calls-on-biden-to-pardon-cannabis-prisoners/

            • @Ensign_Crab
              link
              English
              919 hours ago

              So all the “he pardoned weed offenses” was just as much of a lie as “he rescheduled cannabis.”

              • @MutilationWave
                link
                013 hours ago

                No, it just means he didn’t pardon all weed offenses.

                • @Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  English
                  513 hours ago

                  Right. He timidly only pardoned the ones who were already out. Because incrementalism is about doing as little as you think you can get away with and demanding everyone act like you solved the whole problem.

                  Cannabis is still schedule I and these people are still in prison.

            • @AbidanYre
              link
              English
              315 hours ago

              That sounds like a great place to start; it also wasn’t mentioned in the headline, summary, or original article.

                • @AbidanYre
                  link
                  English
                  110 hours ago

                  Yes. And I’m saying that a “case-by-case” analysis of “nonviolent offenses” is impossible in two months and if he wants anything to happen he needs to narrow the scope because non violent is not the same as victimless. The drug offenses you mentioned seem like a fine place to start.

    • @Brkdncr
      link
      161 day ago

      He could start today and get through at least 35. I’m betting we’ll see less than that though.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 day ago

        Anything would be better than nothing. People are saying democrats should challenge norms. I agree. Get these pardons moving.

    • @affiliate
      link
      219 hours ago

      he can gather a team of lawyers to go through the files and compile a list. lawyers have evolved past the need for sleep, so they have an extra 8 hours a day to go through files. should be doable in 7 weeks.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 hours ago

        Or he could gather double the amount of lawyers and they could all sleep at night. Either way.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      It’s the bare minimum. We are supposed to have justice for all in this country. Not just justice for Hunter Biden.

      How about Biden starts now and focuses on getting as many done as possible. What’s this angle of pretending it’s too difficult?

      • @UsernameHere
        link
        -523 hours ago

        No matter what Biden does you’re going to complain it isn’t enough

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          How are you satisfied with Joe Biden pardoning Hunter Biden and calling it a day? The rich and the powerful get justice and that’s it? Why defend Biden on this one?

          The Democrats refuse to use power for the sake of norms until they personally can benefit from breaking the norm. This doesn’t help anyone other than Hunter Biden. They should challenge norms for the benefit of the American people. Biden has the pardon power and plenty of time left. He should use it! edit: typo

          • @pivot_root
            link
            -3
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            It’s hard to blame people for wanting to hold on to the hope that the Democratic party* isn’t also self-serving. They’re wrong, but their hearts are probably in the right place.

            Edit: In light of the downvotes, let me clarify: I don’t think either the Democrats or Republicans give a rat’s ass about their voters. I’m trying to be charitable towards people here.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              It’s been clear since Pelosi and other Democrats were caught insider trading that most contemporary politicians are self-serving. The distinction we should care about is that for Republicans the cruelty is the point. Where as a democrats at least make an effort to make things better even if it’s incremental.

              Pardons would be an incremental change to a systemic problem that, while insufficient, should be well within the Democrats wheelhouse and not unwelcome.

              Democrats need to stop caring about taking the moral high road and start caring about using power to help people. They can’t be bothered to see the former through to the end so they might as well do the latter. The core message of Biden’s 2020 campaign was a battle for the soul of our nation. Thankfully souls aren’t real because Biden lost that battle hard. edit: typo