@[email protected] to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 2 months agoNo one.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down117cross-posted to: workreform
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageNo one.lemmy.ml@[email protected] to Lemmy ShitpostEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square83fedilinkcross-posted to: workreform
minus-square@Olgratin_MagmatoelinkEnglish10•edit-22 months ago Union jobs SUCK for good workers. The data betrays your conclusion. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27720/w27720.pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268122003249 There’s nothing stopping unions from allowing your boss to pay you minimum while they take ‘dues’ from you. Unions aren’t mandatory. There is no taking. Given such a fundamental lack of understanding on that front really makes me doubt your story. Nothing is stopping unions from being as corrupt as employers. Yes there is, there’s the union elections and the consent required for participation.
minus-squaremadthumbslinkEnglish-15•2 months agoStatistics are used by propagandists. Yes there is, there’s the union elections and the consent required for participation. Union reps are almost always the worst employees. Good employees don’t tend to want to bother with union crap.
minus-square@Olgratin_MagmatoelinkEnglish10•2 months ago Statistics are used by propagandists. And what evidence have you brought to the table? Fucking nothing. At least I brought scientific papers.
minus-squaremadthumbslinkEnglish-14•2 months agoDon’t need it. You’re obviously a leech off employers. If you could simply make a point, you wouldn’t be here QQ’ing.
minus-square@Olgratin_MagmatoelinkEnglish11•edit-22 months agoI make 6 figures and work two jobs. I ain’t a leech, or crying. You on the other hand should quit licking the boot, and stop being a class traitor. And learning how to support your claims with evidence wouldn’t hurt either.
minus-squaremadthumbslinkEnglish-12•2 months agoHere’s a long list of ‘evidence’ for you: https://www.qwant.com/?q=stats+used+as+propaganda&t=web
minus-square@HowManyNimonslink4•2 months agoPathetic. How about relevant evidence to support your point about unions? Or do you not have any? It’s OK to say you don’t have any.
minus-squaremadthumbslinkEnglish-6•2 months agoPathetic is people that can’t negotiate their own pay and think their worth is more than it is.
The data betrays your conclusion.
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27720/w27720.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268122003249
Unions aren’t mandatory. There is no taking. Given such a fundamental lack of understanding on that front really makes me doubt your story.
Yes there is, there’s the union elections and the consent required for participation.
Statistics are used by propagandists.
Union reps are almost always the worst employees. Good employees don’t tend to want to bother with union crap.
And what evidence have you brought to the table? Fucking nothing.
At least I brought scientific papers.
Don’t need it. You’re obviously a leech off employers. If you could simply make a point, you wouldn’t be here QQ’ing.
I make 6 figures and work two jobs. I ain’t a leech, or crying.
You on the other hand should quit licking the boot, and stop being a class traitor. And learning how to support your claims with evidence wouldn’t hurt either.
Here’s a long list of ‘evidence’ for you: https://www.qwant.com/?q=stats+used+as+propaganda&t=web
Try harder, I know you can do it
Pathetic. How about relevant evidence to support your point about unions? Or do you not have any? It’s OK to say you don’t have any.
Pathetic is people that can’t negotiate their own pay and think their worth is more than it is.
You don’t have any, do you?