• @daddy32
    link
    English
    47
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This is not hot air though, so the cited source does not apply.

    Edit: but it does link to more relevant study towards the end, comparing different means of hand drying.

    • Mannivu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      345 days ago

      You’re right and I linked a fairly old study. I’ve edited my comment to add a more recent source.

    • @kautau
      link
      English
      205 days ago

      Findings: Air bacterial counts in close proximity to hand drying were 4.5-fold higher for the jet air dryer (70.7 cfu) compared with the warm air dryer (15.7 cfu) (P=0.001), and 27-fold higher compared with use of paper towels (2.6 cfu) (P<0.001).* Airborne counts were also significantly different during use of towel drying versus warm air dryer (P=0.001). A similar pattern was seen for bacterial counts at 1m away. Visualization experiments demonstrated that the jet air dryer caused the most droplet dispersal.

      • @SmoothOperator
        link
        English
        45 days ago

        Isn’t the point to get bacteria off your hands? Isn’t it better to have them in the air than on your hands?

        It’s a lot more likely I’ll eat something I touched than something that’s been sitting in bathroom air.