• Dragon Rider (drag)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -145 days ago

      Anarchism. Anarchism is just people working together to topple unjust states with violence if need be. No need for voting or governments or corporations to get involved.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            55 days ago

            I’d actually say it’s significantly more political than most. It’s a philosophy about the nature of political and economic power.

            It’s hard to get more political than a political philosophy. About the only way is to find one whose proponents are particularly debate-y and prone to infighting, and fond of byzantine governing arrangements to avoid entrenched or coercive positions of power.

            Anarchism is typically focused on opposition to coercive or involuntary ruling arrangements. It’s beenpoliticized as being in favor of chaos by people on the powerful end of said arrangements.
            Because they’re against hierarchy, anarchist social arrangements typically require much more political involvement than others.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -55 days ago

              In drag’s opinion, involving someone in politics without their knowledge or consent is more political than simply teaching them to value and engage with politics of their free will. The consent violation makes it more political.

              Also in a liberal capitalist society, everything is politicised because everything costs money. In an anarchist society you just go to the grocer and take some food home. Under a capitalist regime, you have to exchange money backed by the state which represents a social construct of value exchange just to buy some bananas. It’s weird.

          • @Passerby6497
            link
            English
            45 days ago

            Less political != Non political

            Again, everything is politics.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 days ago

          I speak of the Platonic ideal of broccoli, please don’t sully it with your crude materialism.

          • Avid Amoeba
            link
            fedilink
            English
            85 days ago

            Who came up with this ideal? Why did they define it like that? Are there better ways to define broccoli? Why do we call it broccoli? What’s the meaning of politics and therefore political? Who… Fuck.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              05 days ago

              1: Some Italian I guess. 2: Because it be like that. 3: No. 4: Italians speak funny. 5: Everything but broccoli. 6: Anyone that consents as long as you don’t hurt nobody.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        English
        195 days ago

        Farm subsidies, ad subsidies for that sector, pesticide use and regulation for vegetables, labor laws for harvesting, etc. etc.

          • @Passerby6497
            link
            English
            55 days ago

            If you don’t think food is political, you’re not paying attention. ‘Every society is three meals from chaos’