• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    68
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Billionaires would say “but those can only do their jobs because there is a company that employs them” and i say no, all of those work perfectly fine as either self employed or with only two layers of hierarchy. CEO’s only exist in oversized, inefficient, leechy companies.

    • riwo
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      no hierarchies are needed

      zero layers

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Not everyone wants to be self employed so legally speaking yes its kinda needed to have some person as an employer, but on a social and decision making level you can democratize it i agree. Ofcourse there are different models with shared ownership and such but thats also not for everyone i think.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          94 days ago

          You can’t really apply the current needs (and partly wants) to an anarchist society. Yeah not everyone wants to be self employed but self employed in the current context is way different than it would be in anarchy. Obviously not everyone would want to go through the whole hassle of self employment (i.e marketing, dealing with taxes looking for jobs to do) and in anarchy you could have guilds or something where you could focus on just one thing you want to do without dealing with all of the other architectural stuff

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          Everyone is already self employed, at least in capitalism. Just some take one really shitty contracts because their skillset has been monopolized by large companies.