@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agoYou don't need to answer thisslrpnk.netimagemessage-square265fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageYou don't need to answer thisslrpnk.net@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square265fedilink
minus-squareDrusaslinkfedilink1•1 month agoThere’s no reason to think that his children would be targeted.
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoThere is ever reason to assume the kids would not be Targeted? Killing one person may not satisfy everyone.
minus-squareDrusaslinkfedilink1•1 month agoIf the gunman was angry about healthcare, there is absolutely no reason that he would go for the children after killing the father. There’s no logic to it.
minus-squareDrusaslinkfedilink1•1 month agoI suspect you are looking at this from the wrong direction. But we’ll see.
There’s no reason to think that his children would be targeted.
There is ever reason to assume the kids would not be Targeted? Killing one person may not satisfy everyone.
If the gunman was angry about healthcare, there is absolutely no reason that he would go for the children after killing the father.
There’s no logic to it.
There is no logic to rage
I suspect you are looking at this from the wrong direction. But we’ll see.