@[email protected] to [email protected] • 7 days agoYou don't need to answer thisslrpnk.netimagemessage-square263fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageYou don't need to answer thisslrpnk.net@[email protected] to [email protected] • 7 days agomessage-square263fedilink
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish1•5 days agoThere is ever reason to assume the kids would not be Targeted? Killing one person may not satisfy everyone.
minus-squareDrusaslinkfedilink1•5 days agoIf the gunman was angry about healthcare, there is absolutely no reason that he would go for the children after killing the father. There’s no logic to it.
minus-squareDrusaslinkfedilink1•4 days agoI suspect you are looking at this from the wrong direction. But we’ll see.
There is ever reason to assume the kids would not be Targeted? Killing one person may not satisfy everyone.
If the gunman was angry about healthcare, there is absolutely no reason that he would go for the children after killing the father.
There’s no logic to it.
There is no logic to rage
I suspect you are looking at this from the wrong direction. But we’ll see.