Excerpt:

Prosecutors highlighted “about $10,000 — $8,000 in U.S. dollars and then $2,000 in foreign currency that was found on his person,” CNN correspondent Danny Freeman said following the court hearing.

“Also they said that he had a Faraday bag,” which blocks cell signals, a move that prosecutors alleged marked “an indication of criminal sophistication and reason they should hold him on bail,” Freeman continued.

After prosecutors made the claims, Mangione said he would like to “correct two things.”

“I don’t know where any of that money came from — I’m not sure if it was planted. And also, that bag was waterproof, so I don’t know about criminal sophistication,” the suspect said in a statement that suggested police framed him.

  • @leadore
    link
    13618 hours ago

    From the article:

    Although a host of eyewitness accounts and video camera footage recorded Mangione’s movements before and after Thompson was killed in New York City on Wednesday, police said they were unable to locate him until a McDonald’s employee identified the suspect at a Pennsylvania franchise nearly a week later.

    They should have said “the suspect’s movements” or “the shooter’s movements”. Not “Mangione’s movements”. They are already presuming guilt by saying it was Mangione who was recorded. Newspapers used to be careful about doing this. I think they can be sued for defamation for this, can’t they?

        • @Snapz
          link
          911 hours ago

          They said with no support…

          Are you the CEO of a news corporation, bud?

          • @Duamerthrax
            link
            6
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            He took Russia’s side in their invasion of Ukraine, which I don’t agree with, but truth is truth and he accurately describes how the media sways public opinion without outright lying.

            • @Snapz
              link
              111 minutes ago

              Sure, but I think you’d understand that I can’t just take pure speculation though. Could you please source your claim so I can consider what you’re saying when you say he “took Russia’s side”.

              Would also be curious of the state he was in while saying that if true, as he’s nearly 100 years old at this point if I recall? Even our heroes get frail and wither, not necessarily representative of their true core positions.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 hours ago

              Can you back up that claim with a link?

              I only read Chomsky saying:

              1. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a crime.
              2. The US + Britain have committed far worse atrocities in war (e.g. Iraq, Lebanon, Indochina) than Russia in Ukraine.
              3. It would be better to attempt de-escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war than to strengthen NATO and continue a proxy war with Russia.
              • @Duamerthrax
                link
                22 hours ago

                I mean, by your own comment, those aren’t great things. 2 is a whataboutism and 3 is the same as giving concessions to the Nazis and lead to WWII. Concessions have already been given to Russia in regards to their previous invasions of Georgia and Crimea. Give an inch and they’ll take a mile.

                Regardless of Chomsky’s stance on Russia and NATO though, he still describes media manipulation acutely. He just has a huge blind spot for when Russia is doing it

    • Dragon Rider (drag)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      913 hours ago

      Maybe Luigi can sue them with all the money people on GoFundMe are desperate to give him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2118 hours ago

      It’s an American newspaper, so it’s up to the victim. Canada and EU have much stricter rules.

    • @woodenskewer
      link
      217 hours ago

      It seems kinda grey because they’re not saying he committed a crime they are saying that he was in certain camera frames and the police were looking for him. If the police announced a name then the news would be reporting fact. The camera bit could be debatable I think. If they were speaking more about the actions of the crime they’d have to alledge, which they did alledge about his “type” of bookbag.

      I could be wrong I just found your comment interesting.

      • @leadore
        link
        2417 hours ago

        Yeah but by stating as a fact that it was Mangione who was witnessed and recorded they are stating as a fact that he is the killer, which we don’t know yet. That is-- or used to be – a big no no in reporting. But times have changed. Here is a link I found explaining how they are probably opening themselves up to a libel charge with this kind of language.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 hours ago

          I think they’re saying it definitely was Mangione who was recorded at the hotel, which if he was checking in/out is pretty easy to prove. From there they lost track of him because they didn’t know his route or he just didn’t show up on any other cameras.

          I agree that the wording is likely intentional to imply guilt, but is loose enough that they could claim that isn’t what they were doing.

    • @SendMePhotos
      link
      115 hours ago

      Was it an employee or a bystander/customer? I’m confused.

      • @leadore
        link
        13 hours ago

        All the accounts I’ve read say it was an employee of the McDonald’s who called police. But who knows? Probably one source printed that and then all the others just copied it.