• morriscox
      link
      English
      619 hours ago

      They sometimes use the IP of others and it can be a real headache or impossible to get permission from everyone.

      • @cmhe
        link
        English
        2819 hours ago

        This argument seems hollow, releasing source code is not an all or nothing situation. They can just release what they are allowed to, and let the community replace the missing stuff.

        Releasing anything is better than releasing nothing and letting the community reverse engineer everything instead of just some third-party libraries.

        • NekuSoul
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          But also, in a world where such a law did exist, it would naturally force every third-party to create their contracts in a way that would allow the eventual release of the source code, or lose out on the deal and subsequently, the money.

          • @cmhe
            link
            English
            315 hours ago

            When we are talking about laws, yes you are right.

            I was arguing more about developers not releasing the source code on their own, when they stopped releasing patches, or even remove the game from stores or shutdown servers, while stating that reason: “We cannot because we use third-party stuff.”

            No, they just do not want to. They might even think that their past games are in competition to their current games. So they do not want people to play (and improve/mod) them anymore.

      • bruhduh
        link
        English
        219 hours ago

        Understandable