• morriscox
    link
    English
    619 hours ago

    They sometimes use the IP of others and it can be a real headache or impossible to get permission from everyone.

    • @cmhe
      link
      English
      2919 hours ago

      This argument seems hollow, releasing source code is not an all or nothing situation. They can just release what they are allowed to, and let the community replace the missing stuff.

      Releasing anything is better than releasing nothing and letting the community reverse engineer everything instead of just some third-party libraries.

      • NekuSoul
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        But also, in a world where such a law did exist, it would naturally force every third-party to create their contracts in a way that would allow the eventual release of the source code, or lose out on the deal and subsequently, the money.

        • @cmhe
          link
          English
          315 hours ago

          When we are talking about laws, yes you are right.

          I was arguing more about developers not releasing the source code on their own, when they stopped releasing patches, or even remove the game from stores or shutdown servers, while stating that reason: “We cannot because we use third-party stuff.”

          No, they just do not want to. They might even think that their past games are in competition to their current games. So they do not want people to play (and improve/mod) them anymore.

    • bruhduh
      link
      English
      219 hours ago

      Understandable