• @the_toast_is_gone
    link
    -101 month ago

    No, he didn’t. Here’s a full transcript of the interview.

    Relevant part:

    Question: If the prices of groceries don’t come down, will your presidency be a failure?

    Answer: I don’t think so. Look, they got them up. I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will. I think that energy is going to bring them down. I think a better supply chain is going to bring them down. You know, the supply chain is still broken. It’s broken. You see it. You go out to the docks and you see all these containers. And I own property in California, in Palos Verdes. They’re very nice. And I passed the docks, and I’ve been doing it for 20 years. I’ve never seen anything like it. You know, for 17 years, I saw containers and, you know, they’d come off and they’d be taken away—big areas, you know, you know, in that area, you know, where they have the big, the big ships coming in—big, the port. And I’d see this for years as I was out there inspecting property and things, because they own a lot in California. And I look down and I see containers that are, that are 12, 13, 14 containers. You wouldn’t believe they can hold each other. It’s like crazy. No, the supply chain is is broken. I think a very bad thing is this, what they’re doing with the cars. I think they lost also because of cars. You know, there are a lot of reasons, but the car mandate is a disaster. The electric, the EV mandate.

    • @jacksilver
      link
      561 month ago

      I mean, the only thing he’s proposing will fix the issue is other people’s actions. In that statement he isn’t suggesting any solutions nor discussing a plan, hes saying if other people fix other problems it may help prices.

      That seems like abdicating to me.

      • @the_toast_is_gone
        link
        -171 month ago

        It’s a far cry from “nevermind, I lied to everyone” like the headline implies.

        • @Ciderpunk
          link
          491 month ago

          That’s not what the headline says, it says “Trump isn’t going to do anything about grocery prices” which is exactly what his statement confirms. He said it’s hard and it’ll probably be fixed by things outside his control, which is explicitly saying he won’t do a damn thing.

          • @the_toast_is_gone
            link
            -161 month ago

            Part of his platform was lowering energy prices - “Drill, Baby, Drill!” He expects grocery prices to go down as a result.

            • @Windex007
              link
              231 month ago

              He had a golden opportunity to make that argument and instead talked about how much property he owned and to talk about a loading dock he drove by.

              • @the_toast_is_gone
                link
                -141 month ago

                It was part of his platform and the part I emphasized shows him referencing it. The author of this article is misleading people with his headline.

                • @Psychodelic
                  link
                  121 month ago

                  You agree with the president-elect’s assessment that reducing energy costs will result in corporations slashing prices for consumers? Do you just believe him or do you have reason to believe his assessment is accurate

                  • @the_toast_is_gone
                    link
                    -71 month ago

                    I’m saying that’s his argument. I don’t know if it’ll work out, but this conversation started because the headline is false.

              • @the_toast_is_gone
                link
                -51 month ago

                My point the whole time has been that the article has a bad headline. If he said something like “We can’t lower prices,” then it’d make sense.

        • @Lon3star
          link
          71 month ago

          Reading it is even worse

          • Ioughttamow
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            I dunno, I mean I guess with reading you can absorb the full inanity of the thing, but at least you can read it in a less motinic mental voice? …maybe?

            • @Lon3star
              link
              126 days ago

              I’ll give it to you that it is a lose-lose no matter how it’s consumed

      • @the_toast_is_gone
        link
        -181 month ago

        Mr. President goes on a bizarre tangent pretty quickly, but you can stop at my emphasis without missing anything important.

        • @Zorque
          link
          41 month ago

          You can probably stop before you even start reading and not miss anything important.

    • @x00z
      link
      151 month ago

      Whenever I listen to him for longer than 10 seconds (or read such a transcript), I literally feel myself becoming more stupid.