Chung Jae-hoon, the president of Hyundai Motor Company, discussed the company’s plans concerning electric vehicle charging during the Goodwood Festival in West Sussex, England. Following the unveiling of the first high-performance electric vehicle, the Ioniq 5 N, under Hyundai's core electrifica

Hyundai Motors Announces Intent to Share Tesla Charging Infrastructure::Chung Jae-hoon, the president of Hyundai Motor Company, discussed the company’s plans concerning electric vehicle charging during the Goodwood Festival in West Sussex, England. Following the unveiling of the first high-performance electric vehicle, the Ioniq 5 N, under Hyundai's core electrifica

  • partial_accumenEnglish
    12•1 year ago

    “should we use an open standard for this new plug?”

    “No, no. Make sure we as a society are beholden to one company forever until about the end of the year .”

    Fixed that for you.

    First, the signally protocol used for all non-Tesla cars at superchargers CCS, which is already an open standard. Tesla cars made after 2022 can also talk CCS to all non-Tesla chargers (with a cheap retrofit for many pre-2022 Tesla cars).

    Second, the NACS physical connector is going through SAE standardiztion right now as we speak and that is expected to be complete about the end of the year. If you like you can already start calling it the open standard SAE J3400.

    • @[email protected]English
      4•1 year ago

      Yeah, they’ll be beholden to Tesla in order to use Superchargers, just like they’re beholden to Electrify America to use their chargers, but the connector and its underlying technology are open. If Tesla decides to switch all their superchargers to some new future non-NACS connector, that would be stupid, but the other companies still wouldn’t be beholden to them, they just wouldn’t be able to use those chargers

      • partial_accumenEnglish
        3•1 year ago

        Yeah, they’ll be beholden to Tesla in order to use Superchargers, just like they’re beholden to Electrify America to use their chargers,

        I’m not following what you’re trying to say. That use of “beholden” usually means “trapped” or “obligated”. If most of North America is using NACS chargers (Tesla and other brands too), then where is the trap? A consumer can simply use another brand of charger is a NACS connector (of which there will be many brands). With the open standards its not like there is a lock on who can make a charger or where that charger can be placed. If anything, most Tesla chargers are not on the best real estate.

        What is your concern with all EV companies in North America using NACS once it is ratified by the SAE as a true open standard?

        • @[email protected]English
          2•1 year ago

          Sorry, I was agreeing with you, just poorly haha.

          Really what I meant is like “if you want to use superchargers, regardless of connector, Tesla has to let you. But cars/chargers switching to NACS doesn’t mean that if Tesla changes their connector your car stops working”

          I’m totally in favor of the change (and I love that SAE is getting involved, since that makes it feel a bit more real)

          • partial_accumenEnglish
            1•1 year ago

            No worries! I’m the first to say I have trouble with the same.