There is no evidence this is an official donation fund

  • Skeezix
    link
    English
    -101 month ago

    why does he need a defense fund? He’s going to be defended either way.

    if they convict him, which they probably will based on DNA and overwhelming evidence, and send him to jail. would he need to pay his lawyers back for their time?

    • @Olgratin_MagmatoeOP
      link
      English
      241 month ago

      A team of lawyers is going to be much better for him than a single public defender ever can do.

      As of right now we have no solid understanding of what evidence there is against him, because the cops could be saying anything they like.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        He doesn’t have a public defender. His attorney is not a public defender.

      • P-38lightning
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -41 month ago

        It must be nice to have so much money and privilege that you can afford a team of lawyers.

    • @FireTower
      link
      21 month ago

      Did he give a sperm sample or something at the crime seen? What DNA?

      And public defenders though they are as skilled as any attorney are very much overworked in many places. Private counsel can offer more attention to the details of a case and spend time researching potentially novel theories to defend their client.

      • Skeezix
        link
        English
        -11 month ago

        They can sample DNA now if you’ve simply been in the area. They can sample it off the backpack he discarded in the park. They can sample it off the shell casings. They have his movement across many cameras.

        Remember, they only have to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

        I think lemmy users need to get their head out of their asses with the “we really don’t know if he did it” thing. As much as anyone might think the crime was justified, the evidence is pretty solid. And with such an emotional newsworthy case, they’re not going to bring it to trial unless the evidence is beyond reproach.

        • @jaybone
          link
          21 month ago

          They also said they have fingerprints from a water bottle. If that’s true, they can probably get DNA from that. If they actually need DNA.

        • @FireTower
          link
          127 days ago

          What do you think DNA is? The thing outside a criminals’s gloves? IRL isn’t CSI Miami. Go swap a NYC sidewalk and see what you get. That’d be a needle in a haystack.

          Remember, they only have to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

          This is like saying remember marathon runners only need to run 26.2 miles.

          It’s not having our “head [in our] asses” it’s a decent respect for the freestanding system of laws. Social media vilianizing or martyrizing people alleged of cromes isn’t beneficial for true justice.