• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66 hours ago

    Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.

    • @evergreen
      link
      23 hours ago

      Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.