• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    that quarter-billion dollar-plus superyachts, and the VIPs who own and cruise in them, may be vulnerable.

    Then don’t cruise in them but instead sit in a bunker like you deserve or alternatively, don’t be a rich shoddy.

      • plz1
        link
        English
        391 month ago

        “Privacy for me, not for thee” means I, as a non-billionaire, get my privacy back before I give one iota about some billionaire not being able to hide a mistress on his super yacht.

        • @werefreeatlast
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          Is it still a mistress if he can’t get it up so she has to slurp it as best she can?

          • plz1
            link
            English
            51 month ago

            Calling her a cleaning lady seems more degrading than the situation is, to me.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        English
        151 month ago

        And the billionaires like Zuckerberg that make a lot of money trying to track you everywhere you go on the internet or with your cellphone factor into that statement where?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -31 month ago

          You know they are not all the same person? Nevertheless even Zuckerberg has right to privacy, not to ours, but to his

          • @aesthelete
            link
            English
            6
            edit-2
            30 days ago

            When anyone else has an actual right to privacy I’ll give a shit about Zuckerberg’s – who btw has done more to destroy privacy rights than perhaps any other human being in history – “right to privacy”.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -129 days ago

              I know who he his 🙄 It doen’t change the fact that equalling all rich people to bad people is counterproductive. And human rights apply to all humans, except if what you mean by the lack of privacy ls that he should go to prision, to which I agree

              • @aesthelete
                link
                English
                129 days ago

                Except the right to privacy isn’t an enshrined human right at all and this particular asshole would lobby government to make sure that any effort to make it one would fall flat.