• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14 days ago

    None of that amounts to this:

    If things are okay just because we like them and not okay just because we don’t then what kind of morals are acting on?

    The reasons this was justifiable have been explained to you ad nauseum. You insist on pretending like its an arbitrary whim despite that. Do you cry every time a drug cartel kingpin gets shot?

    • @Maggoty
      link
      14 days ago

      They literally appealed to the band wagon and a nebulous concept of “social murder”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        You absolutely suck at articulating a point. Here, let me do it for you: the problem with vigilante justice is that the lack of a process around who gets got means that eventually someone is going to kill someone who didn’t deserve it. While Brian Thompson was a worthless parasite who literally thrived based on how much he could increase human suffering, the answer is to reform the systems that allow him to exist, rather than calling for random people to take matters entirely into their own hands and kill whomever they deem unworthy of life. The answer is to bring genuine health care reform into the democratic realm and get to a point where health insurance companies that have a direct profit-motive to deny as many claims as possible either do not exist, or are regulated to within an inch of their lives.

        • @Maggoty
          link
          14 days ago

          That’s a great point but if you look at some of my other comments here, it’s not the one I’m making. I am against mob violence. But by articulating our limits we can also limit the possibility that this spills over into higher level mob violence that targets the hated person of the day.