• @wjrii
    link
    English
    561 month ago

    Here you go.

    South Carolina in September. Low-slung trailer got stuck at the crossing and the driver skedaddled right before the impact. Also, ever so sadly, it doesn’t officially count as a tank, only self-propelled artillery.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think less and less damage to either side as armor and structural integrity increase is probably the norm with trains. For example non armor vehicles are turned into fun metal tangles. This 30 ton “lightly” armored vehicle looks pretty intact. A 70 ton tank might just remain more intact as the train shunts it to the side. The train might take more superstructure damage but there’s a lot of just solid metal pushing in one direction. So I don’t think any impact like that is ever going to actually just destroy the train.

        • Tar_Alcaran
          link
          fedilink
          51 month ago

          The armor is light, the vehicle isn’t.

          On the other hand, a pair of locomotives can easily be over 400 tons, and that’s not counting the rest of the train. Those doublestacked shipping containers on a well car can add 100 tons each.

    • @ramenshaman
      link
      31 month ago

      Kinda looks like an M1A1 Abrams to me

      • @Maggoty
        link
        61 month ago

        That is 100 percent a pally. Abrams don’t have rear doors.

      • @wjrii
        link
        English
        51 month ago

        Nah, it’s got that extra flat butt and long overhang with the basket thing on the back of the turret. The news report also said it’s a Paladin, though this video is also showing off midsize-market local American news, so I wouldn’t have trusted it on its own.