• @jve
    link
    52
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Sorry for Reddit watermark… couldn’t quickly find it elsewhere.

    • @pyre
      link
      4122 hours ago

      that is literally the worst watermark I’ve ever seen in my entire time on the internet, more than a quarter century now.

  • @Randelung
    link
    1181 day ago

    That train will just keep coming. Once such a freight train is going you better get out of the way. The amount of kinetic energy that’s coming towards you is dwarfing compared to a measly tank.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I don’t think your units make sense — kinetic energy has units of energy, but “kg TNT per second” is power (about 4MW). (I think just remove the “every second” and it’s correct?)

        Edit: parent edited comment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          You’re right, but “every second” was meant more as a display of the energy in the train, like a large explosion “every second”. Is that very wrong?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            223 hours ago

            Hmmm, I’m not sure I understand…

            A large explosion every second has units of power, not energy. So to me this is suggesting that the train is putting out power equal to its kinetic energy per second. That’s certainly not the case — it implies that the train is powerful enough to accelerate to the speed in 1s, which is definitely not true.

            But that’s just my interpretation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              323 hours ago

              Yeah, I forgot that a large part of the energy is in inertia and not the pulling of the engine.

    • Lem Jukes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      401 day ago

      Be the change you want to see in the world! Don’t let your dreams be dreams!

      • @Serinus
        link
        241 day ago

        Yeah, but if you’re gonna create it, you have to post to it like once a week or it’ll just sit there dead, forever.

        And who wants to find something to post once a week? Can’t I just have Facebook feed it to me. Picture Zuck saying “here comes the plane!”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          017 hours ago

          Eh, if you spam it enough places, you probably only need to do it for a couple months until other people get involved.

  • @Maggoty
    link
    19
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Well that’s an M109 Paladin. It weighs about half as much as an actual tank. But if it was fully loaded there’s a pretty good chance nobody wins because it’s an artillery system and it carries a lot of stuff that goes boom.

    I don’t care to speculate on who wins between a 70 ton tank and a train. It probably depends on what the train is pulling.

    Edit to add - also we need pictures from different angles. From this angle it looks like the Paladin might have simply been de-tracked. But I’m pretty sure there’s more damage as it’s armor is actually comparatively light, rated for small arms and shrapnel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        618 hours ago

        Technically yeah, colloquially no sane person would judge another for calling such a thing a tank

        • @gmtom
          link
          46 hours ago

          It’s only a tank if it comes from the Tankeshire region of England, otherwise it’s just sparkling armoured vehicle.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          314 hours ago

          Nah, I don’t judge people for being wrong or inaccurate, particularly when the colloquial use of a term is as firmly established. Ideally, people would still know the distinction, and I’d prefer to have journalists be accurate at least, but mostly I care about knowing what’s technically correct myself. I don’t need to be a pedant, I just don’t want to be ignorant.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        519 hours ago

        That’s exactly what it is.

  • @wjrii
    link
    English
    491 day ago

    Here you go.

    South Carolina in September. Low-slung trailer got stuck at the crossing and the driver skedaddled right before the impact. Also, ever so sadly, it doesn’t officially count as a tank, only self-propelled artillery.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        4
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        I think less and less damage to either side as armor and structural integrity increase is probably the norm with trains. For example non armor vehicles are turned into fun metal tangles. This 30 ton “lightly” armored vehicle looks pretty intact. A 70 ton tank might just remain more intact as the train shunts it to the side. The train might take more superstructure damage but there’s a lot of just solid metal pushing in one direction. So I don’t think any impact like that is ever going to actually just destroy the train.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        522 hours ago

        That is 100 percent a pally. Abrams don’t have rear doors.

      • @wjrii
        link
        English
        41 day ago

        Nah, it’s got that extra flat butt and long overhang with the basket thing on the back of the turret. The news report also said it’s a Paladin, though this video is also showing off midsize-market local American news, so I wouldn’t have trusted it on its own.

    • @Madison420
      link
      417 hours ago

      Just skirts and detracted, the hull is probably intact but likely cracked enough it will need refurb at the factory. Also it probably fell off the train rather than ran into it.

  • @BetaBlake
    link
    191 day ago

    🇺🇸This is America🇺🇸

    • @Allonzee
      link
      19
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Attention dispatch… There has been a mass shooting at the site of the Tank Train collision, but thankfully all victims have successfully had their medical claims for woundcare denied. Time to go home…

      Top Gun theme blares as the Police Mustang drives off into the sunset. And… scene.

  • @count_dongulus
    link
    351 day ago

    Considering tanks are transported by train, not surprising. Train big.

  • @Feathercrown
    link
    English
    43
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why don’t we use trains on battlefields? (I see no issues with this plan)

  • @boywar3
    link
    141 day ago

    Isn’t that a self-propelled artillery piece? I wanna say like an M109 or something

    • @FordBeeblebrox
      link
      114 hours ago

      Paladin. The ass end of an Abrams is a jet engine not a rear hatch

  • @jve
    link
    223 hours ago

    deleted by creator

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    41 day ago

    It looks like the tank returned fire.