• @Maggoty
    link
    16
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Well that’s an M109 Paladin. It weighs about half as much as an actual tank. But if it was fully loaded there’s a pretty good chance nobody wins because it’s an artillery system and it carries a lot of stuff that goes boom.

    I don’t care to speculate on who wins between a 70 ton tank and a train. It probably depends on what the train is pulling.

    Edit to add - also we need pictures from different angles. From this angle it looks like the Paladin might have simply been de-tracked. But I’m pretty sure there’s more damage as it’s armor is actually comparatively light, rated for small arms and shrapnel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 hours ago

        Technically yeah, colloquially no sane person would judge another for calling such a thing a tank

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 hours ago

          Nah, I don’t judge people for being wrong or inaccurate, particularly when the colloquial use of a term is as firmly established. Ideally, people would still know the distinction, and I’d prefer to have journalists be accurate at least, but mostly I care about knowing what’s technically correct myself. I don’t need to be a pedant, I just don’t want to be ignorant.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        510 hours ago

        That’s exactly what it is.