In a Dec. 10 order, made public by the Article III Project on Tuesday, Diaz concluded that by publicly criticizing a Supreme Court justice’s ethics Ponsor’s essay diminished the public’s confidence in the judiciary’s integrity.
Yeah! The Supreme Court can diminish the public’s confidence in the judiciary’s integrity perfectly fine on their own! We don’t need you point their literal lack of ethics!
Need to publish using a pseudonym, like they did in the 1770s.
A modest proposal, let’s eat judges …
I wouldn’t call that very modest, but I’m happy to give it a try!
They might be a little old, but we could still use them to feed the poor.
I don’t know, they’re kind of old. They might be tough and stringy. I guess if we stew them long enough…
Instant pot for faster results