• Diplomjodler
    link
    119 hours ago

    It would lead to the breakup of NATO, so guess who’s idea this was.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      37 hours ago

      The US annexing Greenland is all it would take? How so? I’m asking because I’m woefully undereducated in these matters. Couldn’t we form our own NATO, without the US but with blackjack and universal health care?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        107 hours ago

        Greenland belongs to Denmark. Denmark doesn’t want to give it up. So annexing it would constitute an attack of one NATO member on another.

        • Diplomjodler
          link
          6
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Exactly. Also, Europe can and likely will start its own defensive alliance sooner or later. But with the US constituting more than half the military power of NATO right now, that won’t amount to much other than keeping the Russians in check.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 hours ago

            Ah, so the issue is that NATO, in order to be effective, is very much dependent on the US being in it. Bother.

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 hours ago

              Not really, NATO is a nuclear power and a several times bigger conventional military power than Russia, even without the US.

              That said, it would be shit fighting against the US. For everyone involved.