• MightyCuriosity
      link
      fedilink
      341 month ago

      The weirdest part to me would be why he’d write a manifesto to “save the police time” and then not plead guilty

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 month ago

        If you want a trial, you have to plead not guilty. Otherwise, it just goes to sentencing, which would be done in a few weeks.

        Pleading not guilty, he’ll be in the news every couple weeks, inspiring universal healthcare legislation, candidates, and/or copycats.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          This.

          Besides the media play that this will get, jury nullification is still a thing. Even when killing is wrong, it’s possible to convince a jury of his peers that killing one CEO has saved thousands of people.

      • @Delphia
        link
        151 month ago

        Because he has more to say.

        If he was trying to genuinely get away with it, he would have destroyed the gun, not written the manifesto, worn a disguise…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Unless that is all fabricated evidence. Im not even trying to meme here. Some of the “facts” and evidence about this case are odd and suspicious.

      • @Valmond
        link
        21 month ago

        Didn’t they charge him with terrorism?

      • @BradleyUffner
        link
        English
        01 month ago

        If he didn’t do it, why is everyone around here treating him like a hero?