• MightyCuriosity
    link
    fedilink
    3420 days ago

    The weirdest part to me would be why he’d write a manifesto to “save the police time” and then not plead guilty

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3120 days ago

      If you want a trial, you have to plead not guilty. Otherwise, it just goes to sentencing, which would be done in a few weeks.

      Pleading not guilty, he’ll be in the news every couple weeks, inspiring universal healthcare legislation, candidates, and/or copycats.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        118 days ago

        This.

        Besides the media play that this will get, jury nullification is still a thing. Even when killing is wrong, it’s possible to convince a jury of his peers that killing one CEO has saved thousands of people.

    • @Delphia
      link
      1520 days ago

      Because he has more to say.

      If he was trying to genuinely get away with it, he would have destroyed the gun, not written the manifesto, worn a disguise…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Unless that is all fabricated evidence. Im not even trying to meme here. Some of the “facts” and evidence about this case are odd and suspicious.

    • @Valmond
      link
      220 days ago

      Didn’t they charge him with terrorism?

    • @BradleyUffner
      link
      English
      020 days ago

      If he didn’t do it, why is everyone around here treating him like a hero?