• Kairos
    link
    fedilink
    852 days ago

    Armchair psychology by your local dipshit:

    Depression tends to be irrational, and thus thought processes around it tend to be irrational.

    • @shneancy
      link
      521 day ago

      “if i can’t have it, nobody should have it”

      also applies to everyone who opposes progress because they had it hard in life

        • @Zombiepirate
          link
          English
          61 day ago

          Well I’ve had to deal with them my whole life, so you should too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If I was in power we’d deal with them alright. Forced relocation to Bitterville, with a dictatorial mayor hell bent on fixing nothing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 day ago

        I kinda get that. Its like trying to be happy for a billionaire who lives in a castle whilst you can barely afford rent.

        • @shneancy
          link
          322 hours ago

          this doesn’t really apply to billionaires, the same people who oppose things like student debt forgiveness will also lick billionaires’ boots and present them as the role models of the “american dream”

          it’s the bitter people who had it hard in life, and think new generations having it easier is something bad, it’s unfair, even though as a civilisation we should all strive to make life easier for those who come after us. but no “if i had it bad in life, you have to go through the same, or you’re not really [insert whatever group you feel like, man/woman/american/minority]”, as if struggle and suffering was a right of passage

        • @moriquende
          link
          91 day ago

          Except people having it easier due to progress comes at the cost of nobody, while billionaires having it good comes at great cost to everybody but them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -21 day ago

            I’d argue that progress always comes at a cost to something, loss of jobs, rarer to mine minerals, loss in quality to meet demand, etc. But I hear ya

            • @currycourier
              link
              25 hours ago

              Yea for sure, but the cost-benefit is usually (hopefully) pretty skewed. Like even redistributing wealth from billionaires comes at a ‘cost’ to the billionaires, but the downside is their bank account number is smaller (which, who cares). I know you’re not disagreeing btw, just adding to the discussion.