HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden’s press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

  • @Ensign_Crab
    link
    English
    51 month ago

    Being willing to sacrifice the rights and protections of ‘a few’ minorities

    Democrats aren’t just willing to sacrifice trans people. They’re eager to.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      “But protecting minorities just isn’t popular. We’ll never win if we’re too woke.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s reasonable to suspect that woke politics was one of the issues that made them do so badly. As the elections have been lost already, there’s no reason to maintain that pretense anymore.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Tell you what - go ahead and try to put into words what you think ‘woke politics’ are without being bigoted or breaking comm rules and then I’ll be happy to share why I think you might be more comfortable hanging out at a nazi bar.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The problem is not the core goals of woke, which I understand to be inclusivity and social justice. The problem is perfomative outrage and a relentless search for microaggressions. This will alienate people who might in other circumstances be – if not allies – at least sympathetic to the causes.

            • archomrade [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Name an example of microaggression/performative outrage displayed by democrats that you think cost them the election.

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  Because if you find the protection of rights for minorities to be objectionable then you’d find good company with people who think those people don’t deserve protection.

                  But if you want to be vague about what it is you consider objectionable then there’s nothing I can do but speculate

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          That’s not reasonable at all. Harris did almost nothing to support minority rights and definitely didn’t do anything that would remotely qualify as performative. Centrists got exactly the campaign they wanted, you can’t run from the failure by throwing vulnerable people under the bus even harder.