Yes, because if “no one can”, than that not only removes a reward from China for invading, it also adds a serious negative to China since its tech relies on TSMC and provides incentive for other countries to defend Taiwan.
“If we can’t have it, no one can!!” is the best stance to prevent a war in the first place.
Which is still like three years behind the yields that TSMC achieves. If they thought they could take TSMC fabs with little effort and without consequence, they would. A killswitch negates their benefit in trying to take it, as another commenter said, preventing war.
“I we can’t have it, no one can!!”
Yes, because if “no one can”, than that not only removes a reward from China for invading, it also adds a serious negative to China since its tech relies on TSMC and provides incentive for other countries to defend Taiwan.
“If we can’t have it, no one can!!” is the best stance to prevent a war in the first place.
Infants
https://lemmy.world/comment/14169060
You may want to make sure you know what you are talking about before calling others names.
China already started their own chip fabs smic
Which is still like three years behind the yields that TSMC achieves. If they thought they could take TSMC fabs with little effort and without consequence, they would. A killswitch negates their benefit in trying to take it, as another commenter said, preventing war.