That’s a single authority falacy, in this case there is only one opinion, the person who’s protecting their financial information, to promote the idea of not looking into someone’s bank account. When there could be a legitimate reason to look into a person’s finances.
In all seriousness in so far as the meme is presenting itself single authority is prudent. Like what if every decision about yourself everyone was always a stakeholder? That would be hell.
The best answer to that question avoids all fallacies.
“No”
Appeal to logic
So not a fallacy?
I think gigachad could argue that it’s Invincible Ignorance.
That sounds like admitting defeat “you don’t care about any arguments I could make”
Slippery slope, if its no all the time you’ll encounter a situation when yes is a critical answer.
That’s a single authority falacy, in this case there is only one opinion, the person who’s protecting their financial information, to promote the idea of not looking into someone’s bank account. When there could be a legitimate reason to look into a person’s finances.
In all seriousness in so far as the meme is presenting itself single authority is prudent. Like what if every decision about yourself everyone was always a stakeholder? That would be hell.