cm0002 to Lemmy Shitpost · 1 年前Oh well...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square123linkfedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down19cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageOh well...lemmy.mlcm0002 to Lemmy Shitpost · 1 年前message-square123linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarechiliedogglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前Any time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
minus-squarehalcyoncmdrlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前Not telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.
minus-squareJcbAzPxlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前Just because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.
Any time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
Not telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.
Just because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.