Because its gatekeeping. Making blanket statement that a piece can’t be considered art because of certain tools used in its making goes against the whole principle imo.

My comment above is sarcastic btw, I’m not sure if it came off that way. I’m mocking his “you can’t be pro ai and pro art” bit and his whole rant in general. I find it completely asinine when people try to define art to suit their purposes and draw lines between what is or isn’t.