• @Cocodapuf
    link
    English
    23 days ago

    That doesn’t follow at all…

    the simplicity doesn’t seem to necessitate a LLM to map out.

    So are you saying that if something is so simple that you could do it in a week, then it isn’t worth using a tool that would get it done in 4 days?

    I mean, no that doesn’t necessitate use of a LLM. But by that logic, doing math never necessitates the use of a calculator, just do it on paper. Sure, you could…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m saying there are simple and difficult chips to map out and the simple ones shouldn’t need this by virtue of being simple.

      Your analogy of using a computerized tool to complete a task doesn’t really hold as the math you use a calculator for wouldn’t be considered “simple math.”

      • @Cocodapuf
        link
        English
        43 days ago

        No, the analogy is fine. If you have a task (math in the previous example) that takes some amount of time (doesn’t matter how much), is it worth using a tool (calculator) that makes it faster?

        That was the analogy.