• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 days ago

      As someone in the ISP/hosting business, i can tell you that there are plenty of companies incapable of sufficiently managing actual servers. For their own safety it’s probably better to let someone else manage it for them (despite getting ripped off then)

      • @Hackworth
        link
        English
        89 days ago

        I’d like to take the stance that: If you can’t manage your own data, don’t start a business. But that seems like a shaky foundation to plant a flag, so I will instead say, “I hate Oracle.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 days ago

          I agree, and If you can’t manage your own health, don’t be alive, which is why the world should consist 100% of medical doctors.

      • Suzune
        link
        fedilink
        59 days ago

        If they cannot manage their own infrastructure, they also don’t know what infrastructure is needed for their services. And they won’t even have the opportunity to learn anymore.

        Secondly, if you buy external services, you need to consider improving connectivity.

        I mean, you can still work on your on-premises servers, if your internet connection fails. You cannot, if you outsourced essentials parts.

        • @subtext
          link
          39 days ago

          You cannot work on your on-premises servers if you shit the bed with your server management.

          (Just playing devil’s advocate)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 days ago

      Yes but the biggest benefit of serverless compute is not having to maintain a server and only maintaining your code.