• @glimse
    link
    English
    108 days ago

    Agreed but I think the ones who stayed home and actively encouraged others to do the same are worse than Trump voters who keep it to themselves. That Trump voters scored 1 vote and the armchair activist made at least one person not vote

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -13
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Ah I see: A vote for Trump is one vote for Trump, but not voting for Trump is two votes for Trump.

      • @glimse
        link
        English
        158 days ago

        Honest question: how could I have improved the clarity of my comment to avoid it being interpreted as wrong as you did? I’ll rephrase it in bullet points.

        • A Trump voter who doesn’t preach is 1 vote for Trump

        • A non-voter who doesn’t preach is 1 vote for Trump

        • A Trump voter who preaches is at least 1 vote for Trump as they are actively encouraging others to vote for him. Their vote is the 1 plus the people they might influence

        • A non-voters who preaches is at least 1 vote for Trump as they are actively encouraging others to not vote. Their vote is the 1 plus the people they might influence

        So in summary:

        People who promoted voting for Trump AND people who promoted not voting are worse than people who quietly voted for Trump. All 3 groups are worse than quiet non-voters.

        OC is referring to the non-voting advocates that disappeared from political discussions on Lemmy after the election.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -188 days ago

          I don’t remember anyone actively encouraging others to not vote. I’m pretty sure people would just openly say “I am not voting” and then be forced to defend themselves, but that’s certainly not the same as trying to convince other people to not vote.

          • @glimse
            link
            English
            148 days ago

            Were you active on Lemmy earlier this year? It was pervasive. I don’t mean posts detailing why you shouldn’t vote, I mean tons of comments saying that if you voted Democrat this election, you supported genocide.

            I’m just not sure if it stopped because their contracts ended or because the ruble tanked in value.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -13
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              tons of comments saying that if you voted Democrat this election, you supported genocide.

              Yeah, I believe that too. That isn’t the same as telling people not to vote. If you believe you have to vote for genocide to stop a greater genocide then more power to you, but you aren’t allowed to pretend you didn’t vote for genocide.

              I’m just not sure if it stopped because their contracts ended or because the ruble tanked in value.

              Maybe you didn’t know this, but the election ended.

              • @glimse
                link
                English
                128 days ago

                Ya know what, you’re right! Shaming people for voting is not the exact same thing as directly instructing them not to vote. That is a super important distinction that absolutely changes their role in getting other people not to vote.

                It also seems I was wrong about those commenters disappearing after the election. It was my fault to assume that they had a solution to propose. I wasn’t considering how hard that would be to find in total darkness with their heads up their asses.

                You’ve defeated me on a technicality so now I must leave this conversation. Farewell!

                • @MutilationWave
                  link
                  English
                  77 days ago

                  The person you’re talking to was one of the biggest voices of this shit before the election.