How many millions of users does it have? How many posts? How active are they?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 days ago

    Just say 40,000. Which is a pathetic number, but perfectly fine for the type of niche communities budding up here and there across all the domains connected together here.

    • @rockSlayer
      link
      English
      424 days ago

      40k users is huge. Remember, lemmy is not profit driven. We don’t need to grow at all costs, we can grow naturally and sustainably.

      • DeeDan06
        link
        fedilink
        English
        83 days ago

        40000 is enough to be a functioning social media. most fediverse softwares don’t have that much. Sure, it is not enough to have discussions over non mainstream stuff, but there are still enough people for a variety of topics.

      • mesamune
        link
        English
        26
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        …I kinda like it right now. Some communities of less than a 1000 have much more human responses. It nice. And not just from one server.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          144 days ago

          There are huge subreddits that are basically dead or just filled with spam. The ratio of active/passive users on Lemmy must be much much larger. A Lemmy community with 100 active members almost feels like a subreddit with 10 000 members.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 days ago

            The density of quality users and interactions on Lemmy nowadays reminds me of Reddit’s earlier days

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            94 days ago

            A Lemmy community with 100 active members is more likely to be 100 active humans than a subreddit with 10,000 members is, based on the last time I went to Reddit: it was so, so clear that everything was either ChatGPT, or a repost of shit even I had already seen, or was just otherwise obviously not an authentic human sharing something interesting.

            So yeah, not entirely surprising.

            • mesamune
              link
              English
              44 days ago

              It might also be that we were some of the prolific posters on reddit. I heard somewhere that the top couple percent of posters on reddit used to make a majority of the new posts. And the rest lurk

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                44 days ago

                That’s probably true, though I’m not sure who has ever actually made a legitimate determination since you’d have to remove the non-humans from the numbers first and, well, Reddit isn’t going to tank their MAU numbers by ever releasing that kind of stat.

                It’s also not helped once you hit a certain size and the nature of scale takes over and the level of toxicity goes up: even in small groups, when a new person shows up and asks the same question for the 20th time, they start taking shit for it. If you’re in a BIG group, it turns into a giant dogpile, and people stop asking questions because who the hell likes that kind of response, so you end up with a lot of people who are subscribed to something, but none of whom actually contribute at all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 days ago

      I would have, but they asked in millions and I was being cheeky.

      I don’t find it pathetic, I’m quite happy with it. Sure, I’d be happy to get more but in no rush.