• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 days ago

    The problem is that people are vulnerable to disinformation and now there is little to no pushback on these platforms.

    In a world where people are expert critical thinkers with no biases and perfect rationality it wouldn’t matter, but that isn’t how people work in the slightest.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -62 days ago

      Who gets to decide what’s disinformation?

      Once upon a time, scientific consensus classified homosexuality as a mental disorder.

      This is why psychology is a soft science and not worthy of the authority afforded to hard sciences.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Social sciences are important even if finding truth is messier and happens over a longer period.

        In any case, misinformation is often not something that can argued as just a difference of opinion. There are obvious cases like outright lies about the occurrence of events such as “immigrants eating pets en masse” or “the bowling green massacre”, or that the “greenhouse warming effect” doesn’t exist.

        Fact checking doesn’t have to be outright removal either, it just needs a critical analysis of the facts, and people can make up their own minds.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 hours ago

          Social sciences are important, but treating their conclusions as absolute fact the same way we would hard sciences shouldn’t be encouraged.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          120 hours ago

          The problem with economics is that people think that the best economy is one where the richest people make the most amount of money as quickly as possible.