• @FooBarrington
    link
    English
    2110 hours ago

    There’s 0 chance it will be better than their new game (successfully blocked out the title, sorry).

    • @HornedMeatBeast
      link
      English
      149 hours ago

      Their games are from another time, I feel. They are so focused on how they have always made games and somehow proud of it.

      They were great when they were made all those years ago, the times when games felt clunky. It was the times.

      But Starfield still has that clunk and other games feel way more fluid these days. I don’t feel like I can go back to playing a game that feels like I’m playing a brick.

      No preorders, probably won’t even end up playing it because it will most likely, probably, definately, suck farts.

      • Omega
        link
        English
        128 minutes ago

        I felt like Morrowind struck a great balance between clunk and depth. Skyrim was polished but had no depth.

        Something like Kingdom Come Deliverance feels way more clunky to me, but has far less appeal to general audiences than the Elder Scroll games. Although, there are extremely passionate fans of it, so there’s obviously still a market for that kind of game.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        To be fair morrowind was full of clunk, many people were turned off by game mechanics, plus generally forgetting to save before dieing and losing your whole character.

        I think the problem is they tried to scale up the production to reach more people, which increases costs. They can’t make a unique/interesting/quirky game because they have to sell to a huge amount of people or else its a failure. Morrowind likely didnt have the “market cap” skyrim did, but morrowind is full of creativity and choices.

        Morrowind sold 200k copies its first year, and 4 million over its first 4 years while skyrim sold 7 million its first week and 30 million in its first 4 years.

      • misterdoctor
        link
        English
        87 hours ago

        The fucked up thing is that no matter how bad and disappointing Starfield was, and no matter how bad and disappointing their subsequent games will be, I’ll still buy and be naively excited for Elder Scrolls VI because Skyrim was such a foundational gaming experience 😩

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          English
          12 hours ago

          Would you want to play it (and support Bethesda) if it’s as bad as Starfield? If yes I won’t judge you, but if not it’s worth it to wait 1-2 weeks. If it’s bad and you still want to play, the seven seas might provide a solution…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 hours ago

          I genuinely don’t know how anyone who played Starfield could willingly give Bethesda more money for another game. I didn’t even get to the procedurally generated part before quitting.

          I also only lasted 5 hours in Diablo 4. I normally play very curated high quality games and finish what I start no matter what, so this was a huge shock to me having two unprecedented flops back to back.

          tldr fuck gaming I’m touching grass instead

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 hours ago

            A lot of people who played star field didnt pay for it. It was a game pass day one release, which I took to mean they had no hope it would sell well.

        • Doom
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 hours ago

          Just wait a year or two and it’ll be half the price or better