• poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Except that most of the metadata isn’t encrypted anywhere and usually also can’t be encrypted as otherwise the service wouldn’t be able to function.

      • poVoq
        link
        fedilink
        174 days ago

        You seem to be highly misinformed what metadata is. A server for example will always have access to unencrypted IP addresses from the clients connecting to it, this is impossible to avoid unless you use a service like Tor that relays internet traffic, but that has very little to do with “encryption”.

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          Another thing a server can easily access is the timestamp of messages. Even if that is somehow stored encrypted in the server, messages are sent in real time and the server can easily log those, so an e2e encryption chat service will at the very least have logs with IP and timestamps. This can’t really be avoided.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          73 days ago

          And even with Tor, if the person didn’t compartmentalize their conversations into different identities, they’d have the pseudonymous graph.

        • Brad Boimler
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 days ago

          According to signal facts all the have is your phone number and and the date you signed up for the service and the last day you connected to the server. IP address are not logged or stored the do t have access to it and signal has said this everytime the get a warrent for user data. So yes it is possible to have a secure service that doesn’t collect IP addresses but yes the do have some limited data so you are correct.

          • poVoq
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            That is all they claim to store for later retrival*, which is not the same as what they would be able to capture in real-time and hand over to law-enforcement if forced to by a court (and they wouldn’t be able to tell you about it because of a gag-order).

            *However this claim is contradicted by the source-code of their server (which they sometimes publish) which seems to store significantly more and of course this is assuming the code is indeed the same as the one they run on their servers, which is unclear.

            Edit: and their servers run on AWS, so even if Signal itself doesn’t store the IP addresses, Amazon certainly could.

            • Brad Boimler
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 days ago

              Very good and true point well said I agree with you on that good thing I am not important enough for it to be a issue lol or do anything illegal.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 days ago

                Passive data collection is an issue for me even though I am also not important. I do use Signal, but only with my true identity and with a few people I know from real life. When it comes to purely online communities, I compartmentalize my identities.

                • Brad Boimler
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  Same here hence my username on here its the same on all platforms