• @Graphy
    link
    287 hours ago

    What’s funny is that a new GPU alone will set ya back that amount already. I’m hopefully picking up the 5080 at launch for 1k

    • @A_Very_Big_Fan
      link
      English
      357 hours ago

      I’m hopefully picking up the 5080 at launch

      why tho

        • CubitOom
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 hours ago

          You might be better off with a 4000 series, unless you got a new motherboard that won’t be bottlenecked much by the pcie version jump.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 hours ago

            Unless you’re getting a 5090 the pcie bottleneck should be negligible compared to your CPU or other things.

            On pcie 3 the 4090 gets about a 5% performance penalty. I’d assume the 5080 is about the same performance as the 4090 so the hit should be similar. Unless you’re like me with a 5800x3d on a garbage B450 motherboard your CPU is probably going to be holding you back so much more than the pcie version.

            • CubitOom
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 hours ago

              My guess is that if a 4090 is bottlenecked 5% on pcie 3.0 (although I think it’s closer to 10%). Also if pcie 4.0 is double the speed as 3.0, and pcie 5.0 is double 4.0. Then the bottleneck will be closer to 10% if running a 5080 on pcie 3.0.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 hours ago

        Used graphics card prices aren’t that much better than new.

        The 4090 still has a VRAM advantage over the 5080 so it’s probably going to continue to hold it’s value pretty well. Especially since there’s a massive voice in pricing between the $1k 5080 and the $2k 5090.

        Unless the 24gb ARC GPU comes out (or AI crashes) I see the 4090 just not depreciating a substantial amount. And that’s the only option that would compare to the 5080 since AMD isn’t even trying to make high end.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 hours ago

          My desktop is literally only used for gaming (I have a separate PC for everything else) and I spent probably 3-4k on it.

          Buy a lot of high end NVMe storage and I could easily see it costing 5k.

        • Syl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 hours ago

          I don’t see how a gaming only pc has $3800 of non-gpu costs. There has to be a threadripper equivalent cpu and/or a shit ton of storage/ram on there.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            65 hours ago

            Motherboards aren’t cheap, nor is the top of the line CPUs. The 7950x3D is still $600 on amazon. X670e boards start at like $200 and go up over $500 easily. If you just say fuck it and buy the best you can easily hit that number, especially if you throw in some high end storage drives.

            I’m looking to replace my CPU, mobo and ram and I’m looking at at least $1200 for that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              23 hours ago

              Wait for sales and you can spend half that. If you’re willing to settle for anything less than top of the line, you can go even lower. I picked up a 7900X3D under $450 CAD this summer. My Motherboard was under $200 CAD for an ITX board, and I got 32GB of 6000mHz RAM for $125 CAD.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 hours ago

                The 7900x3d isn’t that great of a gaming CPU, you’d be better off with the single CCD 7800x3d.

                But if you’re going for high end why wouldn’t you go for the 9800x3d/9950x3d? The only reason I picked the 7000 series was the lack of availability with the 9000 series x3d at the moment. And if you’re getting 90000 series x870e offers a lot of features as standard over x670e.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 hour ago

                  If it’s just for gaming, you really don’t need the absolute top of the line in terms of CPU. I can’t think of a game I’ve ever played that maxes out my CPU on all cores.

                  Unless you’re also using it for CPU-specific and intensive work outside of gaming, you won’t gain much from spending more money.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    143 minutes ago

                    CPU bottlenecks start happening long before task manager reads 100% CPU usage. Any time a pipeline flush happens and your CPU is sitting there waiting for data to make its way through you’re going to feel it.

                    Also if you’re spending 5000 why wouldn’t you get the best?

    • @AdrianTheFrog
      link
      English
      16 hours ago

      I feel like kinda the main reasons to pick up a latest gen gpu nowadays are energy efficiency and a warranty (although 5000 series doesn’t look all that energy efficient, we’ll see i guess)

      otherwise you can definitely get something better on ebay for cheaper

      but if you live somewhere where energy is expensive, the difference might be significant. 500w is kinda a lot lol, any difference in performance/watt will add up

      prices are going to drop when the new gpus come out and people need to get rid of their old ones, but currently with a little bit of looking i could find a ‘buy it now’ 7900 xt for $640, a 3090 for $775, and a 3090 ti for $850

      honestly these aren’t great deals you could probably find better ones